Trump Signs Executive Order Renaming AI: SHOCKING “Super Intelligence” Move

President Donald Trump signed an executive order requiring federal agencies to replace the terms "Artificial Intelligence" and "AI" with "Super Intelligence," a move that prompted industry pledges, political ridicule, and practical confusion for agencies.

The order was issued in 2026; top tech leaders met at the White House the same week and signed a new commitment, and social media highlighted a spelling error in the posted document that intensified criticism.

What the order did and how it was announced

According to reporting, the White House published an executive order directing federal agencies to use the term "Super Intelligence" instead of "Artificial Intelligence" or "AI" in official documents and communications after President Trump signed the order in 2026, a move described in contemporary press coverage as a formal rebrand of the technology in federal language Yahoo News. The document was later shared on the former president's social platform and observers noticed a spelling mistake where "United States" appeared as "Unites States" in the published file, which National Post documented as a visible error in the text National Post.

Why the administration pushed the change and who pushed back

The administration framed the rebranding as reflecting a new era of capabilities, language picked up by press outlets reporting on the order and its headline phrase "Capabilities Represent A New Era" News18. The change arrived alongside a White House meeting where major industry figures met the president and signed a commitment aimed at improved self-governance; reporters named executives Greg Brockman, Sam Altman, and others in coverage of the September 29, 2026 meeting CNN. CNN listed at least three senior industry names present, and described that high-level pledge as an attempt to show voluntary controls after the order was announced CNN.

The change had immediate administrative and communicative consequences.

A concrete example and the trade-off

Imagine a federal grant solicitation for medical diagnostics that previously required "AI-driven" validation. Under the order, that call would need rewriting to use "Super Intelligence," which could force agencies to update hundreds of forms, procurement documents, and regulatory references. That creates administrative cost and potential legal ambiguity while sending a signal meant to elevate perceived seriousness, a trade-off reporters noted when covering the order and the industry's response Yahoo News News18.

How this affects you and one immediate step

If you work in procurement, compliance, or communications for a government contractor, start by inventorying documents that use the term "AI." Replace or flag those instances for legal review and version control, and time the edits to coordinate with contracting officers so you don't inadvertently break references to existing statutes or agency guidance Yahoo News. This requires time but reduces downstream confusion.

Caveat and a common misconception

Some coverage implied the rename changes technical standards or research definitions. That is incorrect. The order changes federal terminology and communications; it does not alter how standards bodies, academic journals, or private companies must define algorithms or model capabilities, a distinction highlighted by reporters covering the story and the industry meeting context on September 29, 2026 CNN National Post.

Practical takeaway

Inventory every official document that uses "AI," log each instance, and schedule coordinated edits with legal and contracting staff so you can switch to the mandated terminology without breaking references or compliance timelines Yahoo News CNN.